‘Cragley’s home was bizarre not through a … mistake but because there had been no plans to follow at all. At some point … Cragley had read all the valley’s novels (most of them English Victorian, with James and his lust for the Europeans a freak and a fraud), and decided that people then, and only then, knew how to live. So he … moved to a hut which he modelled, despising the mythical author’s vulgarity while applauding his sense, after the shack in Walden. Then, with a base setup, he began his magnum opus, which grew without plan or even an organizing principle, from one descriptive paragraph to the next: a tower from Charlotte Brontë’s Thornfield Hall, kitchen from Wuthering Heights, staircase à la Miss Havisham, and on and on to the formal gardens of Middlemarch. … The house grew like the sloughed-off skin of a snake that had grown confused, thinking itself now a butterfly, now a cicada twisting its way at wrong right angles out of the brittle shell. Thrusting out or retreating to an unguessable center, the finished thing was a nightmare.’

  • Neal Bell, Gone To Be Snakes Now


rejectamentalist manifesto


China Miéville’s waste books

. . .


‘A principal rule for writers, and especially those who want to describe their own sensations, is not to believe that their doing so indicates they possess a special disposition of nature in this respect. Others can perhaps do it just as well as you can. Only they do not make a business of it, because it seems to them silly to publicize such things.’


                Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

. . .


London’s Overthrow.

. . .


archive · random · rss