Typically modern

It may seem at first illogical that a radical theory of rationalism and consciousness, fit to puncture ahistoricism & the nostrums of both right & Fabian simpering, should be, in inchoate form, outlined in the short introduction to a 1936 collection of horror stories.

‘The writer of the ghost story should be a rational man, otherwise he cannot build up the matter-of-fact framework which is so horrifyingly shattered by the incursion of the Impossible. Any credulity would make his readers sceptical from the start; and he would underestimate the amount of preliminary mining and sapping of their confidence in the rational which it is necessary to undertake before he shows his hand. But though he must be by habit a materialist, he must be one with chinks in his armour. He must be devoid of simple faith and also of completely honest doubt - in other words, he must be a typically modern writer.’

  • C. St. John Sprigg, Uncanny Stories 

Christopher St. John Sprigg = a ghost identity of the incomparable Christopher Caudwell



rejectamentalist manifesto


China Miéville’s waste books

. . .


‘A principal rule for writers, and especially those who want to describe their own sensations, is not to believe that their doing so indicates they possess a special disposition of nature in this respect. Others can perhaps do it just as well as you can. Only they do not make a business of it, because it seems to them silly to publicize such things.’


                Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

. . .


archive · random · rss